Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141002
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '17 at 11:41
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 44
2-Core 84.6
45% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 65.6
8-Core 76.9
9% 71.2 Pts
64-Core 85.2
5% 85.2 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Asus(1043 03FE) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 12.8
12% 12.8 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 12.2
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.00K20 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 48.5
Mixed 21.8
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.47
4K Mixed 0.17
29% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback