Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 46.8 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 36.3 25% 35.7 Pts	4-Core 37.4 8-Core 51.7 6% 44.6 Pts	64-Core 37.8 2% 37.8 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8094) 2GB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 4 Parallax 6.6 4% 5.07 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0423B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 125 83 1.7 56 71 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.8% Very poor	Read 160 Write 115 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 56.8 19% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 3% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-038.A00LF 1x8GB 1,348 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 533 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $193

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16