Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 05:48
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$82
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 461
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$139
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 128
48% 87.9 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 82
72% 90 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD easystore 240GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 114 127 110 111 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 413
Write 349
Mixed 304
SusWrite 119
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 6.3
59% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 83.5
DQ Write 51.8
DQ Mixed 35.6
35% 57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 57%
WD WD8000AARS-00Y5B1 800GB
676GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 98 96 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 87.1
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 96.9
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M ECO (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback