Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 69.3 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 166 61% 107 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 586 54% 450 Pts	64-Core 1,025 64% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 20 22 22 31 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 3,591 Write 35.3 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 21.4 193% 929 MB/s	4K Read 284 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 4.5 438% 97 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 134GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,023 Write 3,238 Mixed 4,071 981% 4,444 MB/s	4K Read 313 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 187 798% 220 MB/s	DQ Read 963 DQ Write 599 DQ Mixed 730 558% 764 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung MZ7TE512HMHP-000 512GB 3,033 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 186GB free Firmware: EXT06L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 341 276 291 276 259 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 463 Write 401 Mixed 228 SusWrite 304 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 27.5 104% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 90.3 121% 224 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 100%
Samsung MZ7TE512HMHP-000 512GB 3,033 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 96GB free Firmware: EXT06L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 341 275 295 271 228 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 466 Write 400 Mixed 222 SusWrite 299 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 28.5 104% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 94.4 123% 225 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 100%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 235GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 129 127 130 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 129 70% 97 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB 4,665 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 24.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 21.1 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)