PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171226 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '22 at 14:39 |
Run Duration | 183 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 59% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2143 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 706 701 753 749 714 784 MB/s
|
159%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
856GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 116 116 114 115 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2448 MHz
|
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $148Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 4,163x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $75Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 818x |
Core i7-7700Intel $140Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 392x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 977x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 829x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 822x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $907 |