Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 07:06
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 94.5
45% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 137
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 23 51 71 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 93.5
Write 57.4
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 53.7
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.4
173% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
359GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 111 111 110 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 107
Write 109
Mixed 51
SusWrite 110
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFE85F-C8KL9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback