Today's hottest deals

Asus P5N-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5N-D  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 09:35
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7200-$14
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 36
2-Core 70.4
41% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 68
8-Core 69.5
9% 68.8 Pts
64-Core 71.6
4% 71.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Asus(1043 0354) 1GB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP0812N 80GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TK100-24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 15 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 22.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 19
18% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 31%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
390GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 82 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 83.8
Write 75
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 80.8
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 63%
Adata Classic C008 USB 2.0 16GB-$10
1GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.1 9.7 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Read 21
Write 6.8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 10.1
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.2
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback