Pegatron Pegatron

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPegatron Pegatron  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPX41-D3
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 19:26
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7200-$14
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 77.5
43% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 79.9
8-Core 79
11% 79.4 Pts
64-Core 79.8
5% 79.8 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550
XFX(1682 3530) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6
Parallax 5.8
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-120 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 140 204 19 79 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 187
Write 115
Mixed 137
SusWrite 104
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 20.9
84% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 53.9
DQ Mixed 32.4
26% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41%
Great: 87%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
71GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 72 98 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 109
Write 58.9
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 88.7
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pegatron Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron Pegatron

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback