Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 04:15
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,114
103% 858 Pts
64-Core 1,661
103% 1,661 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 116
Parallax 132
108% 127 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 130
Splatting 107
110% 139 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 513
Write 465
Mixed 403
102% 460 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 52.7
176% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 349
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
365GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 512
Write 478
Mixed 468
108% 486 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 55.8
185% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Read 37.8
Write 41.7
Mixed 36
SusWrite 21.3
8% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.8
7% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 27%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 5TB
607GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.7
Write 41.6
Mixed 30.4
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
312% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
101GB free
Firmware: CC61
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 199
Write 151
Mixed 85.6
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
8GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.8
Write 66.9
Mixed 85
57% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
8TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 186
Write 189
Mixed 120
207% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 99%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
1TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 126
Mixed 92.3
141% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.4
221% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 99%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
31GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 63.5
Write 64.1
Mixed 56.7
79% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 91.8
Mixed 73.5
112% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.8
245% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 61%
WD My Book 1230 5TB
30GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 65.6
Write 65
Mixed 54.3
78% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 63%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
983GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 128
Mixed 90.9
143% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
218% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 99%
WD My Book 25DA 5TB
657GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 103
Mixed 90
125% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 65%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
451GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 118
Mixed 95
138% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.3
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26.6
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 28.2
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $965
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback