Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 20:29
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 132
2-Core 278
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 947
87% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 112
Parallax 103
91% 109 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 102
Splatting 99.2
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
475GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1826 1885 1867 1471 248 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,562
Write 2,048
Mixed 1,725
SusWrite 1,268
373% 1,651 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 71.8
240% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 1,122
846% 1,141 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 266%
Great: 365%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MPAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 111 112 114 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 112
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$183
830GB free
Firmware: SC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 95 99 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 111
Mixed 69
SusWrite 96.2
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
73GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 137 114 118 106 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 82.4
Write 115
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 122
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
308% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: MPAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 125 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 115
Write 124
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 124
71% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 72%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
234GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 174 172 165 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 118
Write 133
Mixed 112
SusWrite 168
186% 133 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.4
404% 4.97 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 4.2
DQ Mixed 1.8
208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%
LG USB Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4 4 4 4 4 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3.9
7% 6.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$130
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 29.6
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 28.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback