Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '20 at 19:21
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600 931 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 91 1-Core 140 2-Core 283 94% 171 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 808 85% 682 Pts	64-Core 816 50% 816 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 70.7 Reflection 75.4 Parallax 75.9 58% 74 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 70.9 Splatting 67.2 56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GB 5,344 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80000E00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 232 306 297 266 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 962 Write 69 Mixed 159 SusWrite 221 76% 353 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 31.6 138% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 460 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 167 155% 250 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 163%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 130GB free Firmware: 0A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 70 70 70 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 64.7 Write 63.7 Mixed 55 SusWrite 69.5 47% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 51%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 73GB free Firmware: 3E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 72 71 68 68 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 89 Write 84.3 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 69.6 55% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-4 9932291-002.A00G Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Adata 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.5% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 25.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 24.8 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	69x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	44x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	26x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBKingstonBench 94%, 31,785 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	11x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,039

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16