Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 10:14
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 85%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 192
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 326
49% 355 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.01% Terrible
Lighting 7.97
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 9
6% 9.84 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.56 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 173 124 126 152 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 293
Write 275
Mixed 215
SusWrite 160
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 16.4
57% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 152
152% 247 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 99 109 120 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 156
Write 126
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 118
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
467GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 92 103 120 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 71.1
Write 79.5
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 115
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 64%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
36GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 12 13 18 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.47% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 12.7
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 17.5
23% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.47%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2400.C8ET Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 7.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-CS R2.0 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback