Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FPV4P
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 08:29
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 478
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2968) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 36.7
36% 40.7 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 33.8
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 338 337 344 342 339 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 446
Mixed 413
SusWrite 318
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 38.6
151% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 252
216% 319 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 171 178 186 179 170 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0 BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0 BLS8G3D18ADS3.16F BLS8G3D18ADS3.16F 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 37.2
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback