Today's hottest deals

Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X79-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160202
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 12:02
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 57
2-Core 144
52% 90 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 634
57% 479 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Dell(1028 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.5% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 127
Parallax 116
91% 118 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 108
98% 122 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 240GB-$600
168GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 274 274 271 274 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 311
Write 276
Mixed 257
SusWrite 274
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 30.1
108% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 215
181% 261 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75%
Great: 81%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 83 94 62 88 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 10.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 83.3
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
84% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33
57GB free
Firmware: PF2OA6EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 47.7
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 50
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0 BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0 BLS8G3D18ADS3.16F BLS8G3D18ADS3.16F 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 7.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 30 84.6" 1280 701 SAM0C00 SAMSUNG
Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback