Fujitsu CELSIUS W360

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W360 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2587-A1
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '20 at 09:56
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 50.3 1-Core 25.7 2-Core 53.2 29% 43.1 Pts	4-Core 91.4 8-Core 90.3 12% 90.9 Pts	64-Core 98.9 6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 LE 202 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(107D 5EFB) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.09% Terrible	Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.09% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM03B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 183 155 161 161 159 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.5% Average	Read 210 Write 158 Mixed 150 SusWrite 165 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 22.2 77% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 97.9 90% 140 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 110%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 148GB free Firmware: 3.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 16 16 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 36 Write 14.2 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 22 19% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 42%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$48 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 47GB free Firmware: 3.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 42 45 42 43 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 53.7 Write 38.5 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 43.1 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W360 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W360

CPU
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GeForce 7300 LENvidiaBench 0%, 202 samples	2x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	1x

SSD
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	2x
X25-M 160GBIntelBench 36%, 7,078 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16