Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A54h
Memory0.1 GB free of 1.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 16:49
Run Duration439 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 40.2
33% 45.1 Pts
4-Core 53.4
8-Core 45.1
7% 49.2 Pts
64-Core 59
4% 59 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$47
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 20 24 36 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 15.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 25.5
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
21GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4.5 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 6
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.2
9% 9.93 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 34GB
null MHz
1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.64% Terrible
MC Read 0.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 0.1
4% 1.47 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 0
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback