Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 134
54% 91 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 320
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Lighting 98.6
Reflection 85.2
Parallax 74.4
80% 86.1 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 77.2
63% 76.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,148
Write 2,209
Mixed 2,453
578% 2,604 MB/s
4K Read 205
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 114
514% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 407
298% 394 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
201GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 364 363 359 365 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 408
Mixed 372
SusWrite 362
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 38.7
139% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 237
177% 236 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
28GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 362 361 357 364 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 460
Write 402
Mixed 336
SusWrite 360
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 31.3
123% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 114
102% 155 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
116GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 364 363 359 365 358 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 408
Mixed 341
SusWrite 362
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 47.5
156% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 243
184% 246 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 121 123 122 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 153
Write 140
Mixed 32
SusWrite 122
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
317GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 108 77 88 101 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 85
Write 120
Mixed 105
SusWrite 93.6
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 1600 CL10 Series Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C11 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C11 24GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback