Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 02:43
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 62.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 205
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 570
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
MSI(1462 397B) ≥ 4GB; GeForce RTX™ 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.6% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 59.5
48% 59.5 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 59.5
49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 29 35 36 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 4,608
Write 39.5
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 33
247% 1,190 MB/s
4K Read 399
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 5.2
612% 136 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 348%
Great: 410%
Toshiba THNSNK128GVN8 M.2 2280 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: K8DA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 122 123 124 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 348
Write 120
Mixed 156
SusWrite 124
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 17.9
60% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 106
93% 142 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 71%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 203
Write 191
Mixed 83.1
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
187% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 111%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 158 160 155 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 161
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 157
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OCPC MMX3A2K16GD432C16W 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $946
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback