Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 09:19
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 84.3
38% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 3.47
4% 4.21 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 113 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 229
Write 168
Mixed 188
SusWrite 88.4
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 18.3
72% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 115
91% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 100%
WD WD1600AAJB-00PVA0 160GB
108GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 85 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 72.7
Write 79.2
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 85.9
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 13
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA770T-UD3 Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback