Average Bench: 42.1% (446th of 1176)

Based on 14,416 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00100FA0 Model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor

Below average average bench

The AMD Phenom II X6 1090T averaged 57.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Single Core Integer Speed 83.8Pts
Quad Core Integer Speed 314Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T is just 10.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Multi Core Floating Point Speed 275Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 342Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 14,416 samples)
Min Avg Max
73.7 SC Int 83.8 93.2
45 SC Float 50.6 55.8
56 SC Mixed 63.2 69.8
45.8% 65.9 Pts
Min Avg Max
258 QC Int 314 373
164 QC Float 190 223
207 QC Mixed 236 279
44.2% 247 Pts
Min Avg Max
333 MC Int 454 549
214 MC Float 275 330
265 MC Mixed 342 413
24.4% 357 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
SC Int 92.2
SC Float 54.4
SC Mixed 68.5
50% 71.7 Pts
QC Int 369
QC Float 219
QC Mixed 276
52% 288 Pts
MC Int 549
MC Float 328
MC Mixed 412
29% 430 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
SC Int 88
SC Float 53.7
SC Mixed 66
48% 69.2 Pts
QC Int 328
QC Float 193
QC Mixed 244
46% 255 Pts
MC Int 489
MC Float 282
MC Mixed 365
26% 378 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
SC Int 88.6
SC Float 52.7
SC Mixed 66.5
48% 69.3 Pts
QC Int 319
QC Float 190
QC Mixed 238
45% 249 Pts
MC Int 473
MC Float 284
MC Mixed 360
26% 372 Pts
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
SC Int 85.7
SC Float 52.2
SC Mixed 65.7
47% 67.9 Pts
QC Int 314
QC Float 188
QC Mixed 236
44% 246 Pts
MC Int 465
MC Float 279
MC Mixed 348
25% 364 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
SC Int 85.5
SC Float 52.3
SC Mixed 64.8
47% 67.5 Pts
QC Int 312
QC Float 190
QC Mixed 237
44% 246 Pts
MC Int 457
MC Float 281
MC Mixed 349
25% 362 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
SC Int 86
SC Float 51.3
SC Mixed 64.9
47% 67.4 Pts
QC Int 317
QC Float 188
QC Mixed 234
44% 246 Pts
MC Int 469
MC Float 278
MC Mixed 351
25% 366 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
SC Int 84.7
SC Float 50.5
SC Mixed 64
46% 66.4 Pts
QC Int 315
QC Float 188
QC Mixed 226
44% 243 Pts
MC Int 367
MC Float 239
MC Mixed 322
21% 309 Pts
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
SC Int 82.8
SC Float 51.8
SC Mixed 64.4
46% 66.3 Pts
QC Int 308
QC Float 164
QC Mixed 211
41% 228 Pts
MC Int 454
MC Float 273
MC Mixed 338
24% 355 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
SC Int 67.6
SC Float 27.4
SC Mixed 35.9
30% 43.6 Pts
QC Int 208
QC Float 122
QC Mixed 106
26% 145 Pts
MC Int 220
MC Float 127
MC Mixed 156
12% 168 Pts
14,416 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 18,663,661 CPUs tested.

 Prices

AmazonUS $3452 years
Send price feedback
Typical Phenom II X6 1090T Builds (Compare 2,386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $848

Popular Phenom II X6 1090T compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

2 months ago.

packs a lot of power for older cpus


Excellent

8 months ago.

Realy happy with it. For an old system of 5th years it still gaming very well.


Excellent

11 months ago.

still using in gaming in 2018! is an ol' good guy now!


Excellent

10 months ago.

used this for 9-10 years i think - still going strong with SSD - Win 10 start time under 15s, no issues.


Excellent

15 months ago.

still powerful cpu which allows me play all new 3xA projects


Poor

6 months ago.

That CPU didn't even have SSE4.1 nor SSSE3 when it was released back in 2010, lol. Any Core 2 Duo or Quad from 2007 feature both of these instruction sets.


Excellent

21 months ago.

Even 2017, one of the best CPU 6 cores ever tested, the integer speed in overclock can deal versus i7 6700k in multicore, but as it's pretty old the float point speed is so pour, but it's really good to work virtual machines, programing, even rendering in most cases, gaming and streaming better than an A10 6800k for example


Excellent

13 months ago.

I can't believe how long this thing has lasted me (build is 7 years old, and I don't think it was just released then). Along the way, having 16GB RAM and component upgrades (GPU currently a 970, added some SSDs) have kept it useful. It's definitely time to upgrade, as it's starting to struggle. Finally. Now. In 2018. Of note: one thing that has kept it going so long is (carefully!!) vacuuming out its heatsink, removing all the crap accumulated between the vanes (which act as an insulator). It's also in a dust-filtered case. All in all, I've gotten my money's worth and then some out of this chip.


Your
opinion?
1176 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $199Nvidia GTX 1070 $391Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $251Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i9-9900K $485Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback