Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '20 at 01:10
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 72.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 871 79% 662 Pts	64-Core 1,281 79% 1,281 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Lighting 73.1 Reflection 72.3 Parallax 70 60% 71.8 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 68.1 Splatting 67.2 56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 664 335 333 323 306 326 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 2,028 Write 1645 Mixed 626 SusWrite 381 259% 1,170 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 54.9 194% 71 MB/s	DQ Read 666 DQ Write 584 DQ Mixed 606 459% 619 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 254%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 21GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 208 102 119 111 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 502 Write 352 Mixed 334 SusWrite 162 75% 338 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 34.9 89% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 194 175% 262 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 103%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 187GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 84 83 83 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 84.7 Write 87.9 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 83.5 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 125 123 120 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 64.6 Write 124 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 123 70% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 202% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 90%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 0740 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.55% Terrible	Read 11 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.7 8% 6.8 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 11,284 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.2% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 25.1 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.6 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	328x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	195x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $81Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)