Casper PRO DT N100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Casper PRO DT N100 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER H310H5 M11 001
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180725
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 10 '20 at 22:32
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 77.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 250 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 675 73% 579 Pts	64-Core 704 44% 704 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% XFX(1682 5230) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.22% Terrible	Lighting 5.57 Reflection 5.77 Parallax 5.62 4% 5.65 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 4.22 4% 4.42 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 809GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 99 88 103 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 10.7 Write 154 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 98.7 48% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.1 50% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.M8FE 1x4GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.5% Poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.3 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 4 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRO DT N100 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Casper PRO DT N100

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	26x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	6x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	5x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 38%, 5,399 samples	10x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	4x
M378A1G43EB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 417 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $154

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16