Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 18:24
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 41
2-Core 117
50% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 373
36% 298 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 22.1
18% 20.1 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 0.09
11% 15.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 30 18 13 30 19 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 200
Write 100
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 35.5
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 10
45% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 12
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 12.1
10% 14 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
741GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.2 9.3 9.2 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 142
Write 130
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 8.9
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
413GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 30 24 14 31 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 96.6
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 38
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 74%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.1 9.3 9.2 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 75.5
Write 8.3
Mixed 14
SusWrite 8.5
19% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
102GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 65 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 69
Write 64.7
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 63.6
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 60%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
70GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 65 64 64 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 78.4
Write 88.9
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 63.8
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 1TB
662GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 27.2
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 27.9
37% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 43%
Prolific USB-SATA Bridge 500GB
310GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 21.6
Write 21.9
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 20.5
28% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback