Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 14:35
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 795
83% 666 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.9% Above average
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 71.7
62% 75.7 fps
MRender 78.6
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 63.2
57% 70.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 407
Mixed 417
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 52.2
194% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 131
152% 264 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 136
Mixed 131
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.3
116% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 135
Write 150
Mixed 145
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.28
110% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 84%
Prolific USB-SATA Bridge 500GB
359GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 101
Write 103
Mixed 101
132% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.32
71% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 31.4
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 31.2
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback