Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '19 at 21:44
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 61.3 1-Core 120 2-Core 238 75% 140 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 737 74% 601 Pts	64-Core 1,263 78% 1,263 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3729) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 36.3 31% 34.5 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 35.2 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 270GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 245 245 245 246 245 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 474 Write 253 Mixed 247 SusWrite 248 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 29.6 110% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 158 132% 191 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 126%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB 4,090 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 743GB free Firmware: MZ4OAAB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 80 101 105 101 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 96 Write 85.2 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 98 54% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 722GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 198 196 197 198 199 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 148 Mixed 89.7 SusWrite 195 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 186 188 187 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 151 Mixed 85 SusWrite 186 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2.5TB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 190 176 182 190 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 214 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 183 125% 172 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 113%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 618GB free Firmware: 2AR20002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 92 88 89 90 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 84.8 Write 45.2 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 88.2 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 652GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 124 160 161 161 160 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 151 Write 130 Mixed 26 SusWrite 146 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 137GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 80 80 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 76.8 Write 73 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 79.3 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 68%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 119 121 122 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 120 140% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 55%
TrekStor DS pocket Xpress 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 318GB free, PID 0022 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 31.5 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 20.1 33% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 21%
WDC WD32 00LPCX-24C6HT0 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 69GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.6% Very poor	Read 34 Write 31.2 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 21.3 37% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2133C15-8GNT Patriot 2400 C15 Series F4-2133C15-8GNT Patriot 2400 C15 Series 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.7% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 23.2 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 16.6 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	419x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)