Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 76.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 227 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 457 61% 456 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 5,763 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 379D) 3GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 41.8 33% 37.7 fps	MRender 29.4 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 21.2 23% 29.6 fps
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 30%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 35 33 32 12 35 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17% Very poor	Read 59.4 Write 77.9 Mixed 22 SusWrite 26.7 10% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 15.8 33% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 54.1 DQ Mixed 109 64% 64 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 90%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 698GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 174 171 160 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 172 Mixed 35.4 SusWrite 172 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
DH Ext. HDD 500GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 376GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 107 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 102 Write 109 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 107 129% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 14 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	114x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	111x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	97x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	139x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	119x

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $502

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16