Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$100 1,546 User benchmarks, average bench 28% mPGA478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Memory 41.8 1-Core 23 2-Core 22.4 22% 29.1 Pts	4-Core 22.7 8-Core 22.9 3% 22.8 Pts	64-Core 22.9 1% 22.9 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor 6K040L0 40GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: NAR61HA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 21 20 20 20 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	9.1% Terrible	Read 13 Write 16.3 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 18.7 12% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.1% Great: 29%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 12GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.7 6.8 3.9 4.4 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.56% Terrible	Read 29.3 Write 1.3 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 5 10% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 55% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.56% Great: 17%
DH Ext. HDD 500GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 13GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 23 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 23.8 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 22.1 31% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 512, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	6.6% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.6% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16