Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3570-$49 423 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 97.4 1-Core 84 2-Core 168 71% 116 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 403 47% 367 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 44.8 Parallax 39.6 39% 43.9 fps	MRender 40.5 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 36.5 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 175 182 194 195 182 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.1% Below average	Read 198 Write 96.3 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 188 32% 141 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 12.4 50% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 11.8 DQ Write 17.2 DQ Mixed 14.8 11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 400GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 172 173 173 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 154 Mixed 37 SusWrite 172 94% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 14.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 48.8 82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $377