Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '19 at 08:55
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 178 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 307 41% 308 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 32.1 28% 30.9 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 33.8 Splatting 29.4 27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Richdisk device 250GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 50GB free Firmware: 1010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 12 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Read 22 Write 41.3 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 13.1 6% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.4 8% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 17%
Richdisk device 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 68GB free Firmware: 1010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 12 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.22% Terrible	Read 59 Write 41.3 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 13.1 9% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.1 10% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 15%
Richdisk device 54GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 12 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 45.8 Write 39.5 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 13.1 26% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.7 442% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 1x8GB 2,797 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 80.9 50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	310x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	174x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	148x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	46x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	31x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157