Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '18 at 13:09
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4 PRO-7300B APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 95.8
54% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 86
8-Core 100
12% 93.2 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 3.62
3% 3.89 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 4.22
3% 3.94 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 500GB
331GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 13 5.1 9.5 7.2 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Read 26.2
Write 44.1
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 10.7
6% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 5.8
18% 6.17 MB/s
DQ Read 5.9
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 6.3
5% 7.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 15%
Richdisk device 54GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 13 5.1 9.5 7.2 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 25.8
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 10.7
17% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 7
1,184% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-036.A00LF 12GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 9
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-DGS Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback