Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 05:08
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 288
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 872
92% 734 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0782) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 47
Parallax 61.2
42% 53.2 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 44.7
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 341 337 343 347 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 480
Mixed 441
SusWrite 351
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 56.8
185% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
226GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 330 327 330 330 330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 328
Mixed 297
SusWrite 329
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 40
142% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 183
155% 222 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$84
98GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 137 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 112
Write 65.7
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 138
72% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
909GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 183 186 185 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 172
Mixed 115
SusWrite 185
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
63GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 67 65 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 33.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 64.8
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
29GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.6 9 7.7 8.4 7.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 6.7
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 8.6
17% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.1
124% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 16,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $317

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback