Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 10:45
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 635
63% 512 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 184
Parallax 193
146% 185 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 177
Splatting 122
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
274GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 173 172 175 167 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 413
Write 443
Mixed 314
SusWrite 173
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 37.1
131% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 180
153% 218 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 107%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 212 210 214 211 213 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 456
Mixed 433
SusWrite 212
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 48.2
162% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 293
238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 123%
Kingston SVP100S296G 96GB
118GB free
Firmware: CJR10202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 261 256 262 270 273 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 358
Write 229
Mixed 267
SusWrite 262
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 28.3
86% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 30.8
35% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 69%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
145GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 238 241 230 235 222 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 312
Write 286
Mixed 280
SusWrite 234
63% 278 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 30.9
120% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 176
164% 253 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 61%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 147 150 147 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 121
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 146
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
HitachiG ST 2TB
1TB free, PID 1015
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 117 116 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 138
Write 141
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 116
157% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
HitachiG ST 2TB
795GB free, PID 1015
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 88 86 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 123
Write 127
Mixed 75
SusWrite 87.1
137% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 44.4
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 21.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 112%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $540
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback