Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 26%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 23:59
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 382
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 39.6
35% 41.4 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 27.6
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 235 186 187 198 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 359
Write 313
Mixed 244
SusWrite 211
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 28.6
91% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 55.4
DQ Mixed 96
74% 103 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$18
332GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 135 140 141 145 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 141
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 140
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 26%
Desktop 75%
Workstation 22%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback