Biostar X370GT7

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar X370GT7 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190304
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '19 at 03:29
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 71 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 146 58% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 275 36% 273 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38.1% Below average	Lighting 49.6 Reflection 32.9 Parallax 65.8 40% 49.4 fps	MRender 31.1 Gravity 50.6 Splatting 40.5 34% 40.8 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 297 292 303 304 304 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 468 Mixed 400 SusWrite 316 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 52.8 176% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 359 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 290GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 189 188 188 189 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 146 Mixed 89 SusWrite 188 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C17 XMP 3000 15 2x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 29.5 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 20.9 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370GT7 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar X370GT7

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	7x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	6x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	7x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	4x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	3x

SSD
GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GBXPGBench 215%, 12,312 samples	4x
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent $100Bench 317%, 46,203 samples	4x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	3x

RAM
KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 8,345 samples	5x
BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 4x8GBCrucialBench 99%, 656 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $302

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16