Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 02 '19 at 13:28
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 71 1-Core 24.2 2-Core 51.6 35% 48.9 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 284 30% 241 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.6% Poor	Lighting 29.9 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 31.9 24% 29.1 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 32.7 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TAMMUZ 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0527A SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 101 103 103 105 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.5% Average	Read 422 Write 97 Mixed 138 SusWrite 101 41% 190 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 9.4 55% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 63.4 63% 102 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 106GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 127 130 129 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	77% Very good	Read 140 Write 104 Mixed 78 SusWrite 129 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 14.3 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 7.9 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16