Today's hottest deals

Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '16 at 22:32
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 180
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 342
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 72
Parallax 60.2
43% 61.6 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 67
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 403
Mixed 409
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 27.2
146% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 48.3
54% 95.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
745GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 163
Mixed 151
121% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.37
130% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 109%
Inateck FE2005 480GB
347GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 321
Write 291
Mixed 165
315% 259 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 3.8
2,157% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 72.1
DQ Mixed 5.06
2,699% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 291%
This bench: 291%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback