PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K SE (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090625 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 23 '19 at 15:37 |
Run Duration | 216 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5440
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
47.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gainward(10B0 1402) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
GOODRAM 480GB
149GB free
Firmware: SBFM10.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 142 155 139 84 85 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 157 183 197 202 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
18GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 79 53 59 52 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 135 149 173 172 MB/s
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB
190GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 30 31 MB/s
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 37x |
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 17x |
Core2 Duo E8200Intel $12Bench 40%, 4,318 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 9x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |