Asus P5K SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5K SE  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '19 at 15:37
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5440
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 80
41% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 139
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gainward(10B0 1402) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 28.3
26% 30.5 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 29.7
26% 31.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 480GB
149GB free
Firmware: SBFM10.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 142 155 139 84 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.9% Above average
Read 200
Write 110
Mixed 165
SusWrite 125
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 31.4
116% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 136
111% 158 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 157 183 197 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.7% Good
Read 250
Write 238
Mixed 228
SusWrite 171
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 36.5
123% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 174
133% 179 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
18GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 79 53 59 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 50
Write 68.4
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 64.8
45% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 135 149 173 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 163
Write 175
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 146
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB
190GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 30 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.8% Very poor
Read 31
Write 34
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 29.1
42% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 10
7% 10 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K SE Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback