Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q PRO TURBO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q PRO TURBO  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 16:33
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5440
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 116
51% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 220
27% 208 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 352.84
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 30.4
18% 26.2 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 24.7
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.5 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010BL00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 200 203 211 206 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 236
Write 233
Mixed 194
SusWrite 201
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 25.1
92% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 28.9
29% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 87%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$39
242GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 101 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 102
Write 95.6
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 100
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.6
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q PRO TURBO Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P5Q PRO TURBO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $501
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback