Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181208
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '19 at 19:34
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 61.5 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 160 58% 102 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 487 48% 392 Pts	64-Core 537 33% 537 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C300) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.4% Very good	Lighting 94.6 Reflection 129 Parallax 113 77% 112 fps	MRender 91.2 Gravity 118 Splatting 98.8 84% 103 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$80 8,191 User benchmarks, average bench 229% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1960 Write 1,293 Mixed 1,061 317% 1,438 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 57.3 159% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 854 DQ Write 672 DQ Mixed 738 559% 754 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 308%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 91GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 434 Write 423 Mixed 381 92% 413 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 45.9 146% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 345 263% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 336GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,620 Write 40.5 Mixed 75 892% 1,245 MB/s	4K Read 507 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2 21,363% 170 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 LENOVO 2TB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 934GB free Firmware: MN6OA5R0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,054 Write 45.5 Mixed 73.8 758% 1,058 MB/s	4K Read 429 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.7 18,211% 144 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 84%
Lexar JumpDrive S70 32GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 23GB free, PID a201 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3.3 Write 2.2 Mixed 2.7 3% 2.73 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x16GB 3,191 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 27.2 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 18.4 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)