Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 66.2 2-Core 134 58% 95 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 247 29% 225 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 259 257 258 255 253 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 420 Mixed 344 SusWrite 272 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 46.8 150% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 263 197% 263 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 126GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 118 119 121 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 14 Write 70 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 120 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 112%
JetFlash Flash Disk 1GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.7 3.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.96% Terrible	Read 11.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.7 7% 5.88 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	46.3% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.3 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16