Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 11:57
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 115
57% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 409
39% 320 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 55.3
34% 42.5 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 37.3
29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 197 192 181 190 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 446
Write 304
Mixed 199
SusWrite 194
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 37.5
110% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 228
179% 248 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 101%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 95.9
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 1TB
727GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 81.3
Write 91.7
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 90
108% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback