Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 09:28
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$195
, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 144
79% 126 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 885
87% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,474
91% 1,474 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2880 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 187
Parallax 189
158% 190 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 186
Splatting 122
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 1292 1268 1253 1263 1257 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,150
Write 1,673
Mixed 823
SusWrite 1,253
329% 1,475 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 60.7
236% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,226
DQ Write 973
DQ Mixed 996
773% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 283%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
832GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 445 442 439 442 440 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 490
Write 469
Mixed 449
SusWrite 438
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 53.6
181% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 129%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
680GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 159 158 147 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 85.2
Write 120
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 158
70% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
745GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 164 165 155 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 88.5
Write 112
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 164
71% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
354% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
852GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 164 163 165 152 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 84.2
Write 101
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 161
68% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 110%
H/W DISK 3 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44% Average
Read 122
Write 111
Mixed 74
SusWrite 80.4
127% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
134% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%
H/W DISK 1 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 161
Write 132
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 0.3
107% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 60%
H/W DISK 2 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 81 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 186
Write 136
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 81.6
147% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 72%
H/W DISK 4 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 1.2
84% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 27.9
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 11.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $572
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback