Today's hottest deals

Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 03:58
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 220
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 619
60% 496 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 190
Parallax 184
138% 181 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 185
Splatting 124
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 371 339 353 384 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 427
Mixed 374
SusWrite 372
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 39.7
122% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
266% 348 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 426 414 435 429 443 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 439
Mixed 400
SusWrite 430
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 34.5
111% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 361
266% 348 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 237 231 242 242 244 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.8% Good
Read 253
Write 241
Mixed 233
SusWrite 240
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 34.6
112% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 33.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 95%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback