Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory1.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120620
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 21:48
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 89
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 410
44% 348 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 18.1
15% 17.4 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 19.9
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
756GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PT0D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 123
Mixed 69
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
61% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 84%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.6
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.8
19% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 87%
WL2000GS A6472E 2TB
341GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 31.5
Write 22.8
Mixed 23.5
32% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
118% 1.37 MB/s
H/W DISK 1 2TB
754GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.8
Write 21.8
Mixed 23.2
31% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 49%
H/W DISK 2 2TB
273GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.1
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.5
33% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 41%
H/W DISK 3 2TB
641GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1.1 1.2 1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 30.8
Write 22.3
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 1
24% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 44%
H/W DISK 4 2TB
365GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 0
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 57%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
13TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.3 8.3 8.1 8.3 8.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 15.7
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 8.3
17% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.1
116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 14%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.1 8.1 8 8.1 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 8.1
27% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
900GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 23
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 0
23% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 46%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
52GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1 1 1.3 1 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 23.5
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 1.1
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Performance DDR3 1600 C9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback