Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateDec 01 '18 at 08:41
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 627
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 851
53% 851 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 53.9
57% 63.7 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 74
60% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 43 44 42 41 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
53% Above average
Read 383
Write 50.5
Mixed 83
SusWrite 42.9
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 18.1
89% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 49.1
72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
313GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 70 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 94
Write 128
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 72.2
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
247GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 68 66 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 65.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 67.2
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 16GB
14GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 5.3 5.9 4.2 5.3 5.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 2.8
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 5
6% 5.97 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 23%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
120GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 36
Write 36
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 32
44% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 49%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
573GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 35
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 0.1
32% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 53%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
608GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 34.8
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 4.1
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 26.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $456
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback