Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 31 '18 at 15:26
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 329
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3555) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.1% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 12
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.3
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 PRO SSD 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 26 17 3.8 35 5.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 266
Write 140
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 21.4
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 5.8
34% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
938GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 103 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 141
Write 140
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 103
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
135GB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 27.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 13.4
18% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 104%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
226GB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 139 135 138 138 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 98.9
Write 130
Mixed 89
SusWrite 133
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
271% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 97%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
29GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 12.3
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 21%
Initio INIC-3609 500GB
56GB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 36.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 40.1
46% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 142%
TrekStor DS maxi light 2TB
952GB free, PID 003f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 24.7
Mixed 24
SusWrite 12.3
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 28%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
151GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 115 115 115 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49% Average
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 116
144% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro4 Builds (Compare 788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4 - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $550
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback