Average Bench: 39.9% (985th of 1314)

Based on 4,097 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00100F62, 178BFBFF00100F63 Model: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 215 Processor
Poor: 30%Average: 39.9% Great: 50%
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop 46%
Workstation 27%

Poor average bench

The AMD Athlon II X2 215 averaged 60.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Memory Latency 65.5Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 45.2Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Athlon II X2 215 is just 19.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Athlon II X2 215 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 88.6Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 88Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 4,097 samples)
Min Avg Max
48.2 Memory 65.5 87.4
31.7 1-Core 45.2 49.9
47.9 2-Core 84.9 99.2
42.5% 65.2 Pts
Min Avg Max
48.7 4-Core 85.8 99.5
58 8-Core 88 99.6
11.9% 86.9 Pts
Min Avg Max
57.5 64-Core 88.6 99.7
5.9% 88.6 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Memory 70.3
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 94
46% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 95.8
8-Core 97.2
13% 96.5 Pts
64-Core 95.5
6% 95.5 Pts
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Memory 70.2
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 83.2
45% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 83.9
8-Core 95.2
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 97.3
6% 97.3 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Memory 66.3
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 91.8
44% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 93.6
8-Core 94.1
13% 93.8 Pts
64-Core 94
6% 94 Pts
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Memory 65.8
1-Core 46
2-Core 66.1
40% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 82
8-Core 85
11% 83.5 Pts
64-Core 83.6
6% 83.6 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Memory 55.7
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 92
41% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 90
8-Core 97
13% 93.5 Pts
64-Core 96.5
6% 96.5 Pts
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Memory 42.7
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 94.6
36% 61.3 Pts
4-Core 95.8
8-Core 93.5
13% 94.7 Pts
64-Core 85.9
6% 85.9 Pts
4,097 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 43,103,403 CPUs tested.


AmazonUS $298 months
Send price feedback
Typical Athlon II X2 215 Builds (Compare 1,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $64

Popular Athlon II X2 215 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added n/a ago.


7 months ago.

fr: peu de puissance du a une fréquence faible. mais se débrouille bien dans les taches simples. Utiliser le de présence avec un système linux car sur Windows il a un peu de male. très bon pour une utilisation d’un petit serveur sous linux. en: little power due to low frequency. but does well in simple spots. Use the presence with a linux system because on Windows it has a bit of trouble. very good for using a small linux server.


8 months ago.

its so slow even overclocked to 3.2ghz iknow it is a old cpu but still there are more better value to performance cpus on the market such as the cheapo athlon g500e


13 months ago.

Still great as a daily driver on Windows 10


3 years ago.

was good processor


8 months ago.

good cpu for simple tasks

1314 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $210Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback