TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

Xeon Gold 6146

▲ 500 ▼

2 Cores, 4 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2019.

Average Bench: 69.2% (427th of 1456)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Device: 0000000000000000 Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6146 CPU @ 3.20GHz
Poor: 49%Average: 69.2% Great: 76%
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Above average average bench

The Intel Xeon Gold 6146 averaged 30.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Quad Core Speed 404Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 107Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Xeon Gold 6146 is 26.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Xeon Gold 6146 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 683Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 634Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Rank 42769.2%
Min Avg Max
54.6 Memory 65.7 75.2
79.1 1-Core 107 122
151 2-Core 208 244
69.7% 127 Pts
Min Avg Max
255 4-Core 404 482
251 8-Core 634 962
63.9% 519 Pts
Min Avg Max
288 64-Core 683 1,171
42.3% 683 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
77.8% Very good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 225
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 903
82% 691 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
77.1% Very good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 235
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 976
83% 714 Pts
64-Core 973
60% 973 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
75.5% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 244
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 428
58% 434 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
73.9% Very good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 225
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 462
64% 472 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
66.7% Good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 97
2-Core 165
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 808
66% 578 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
49.3% Average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 151
53% 95 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 251
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,178,119 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-9700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400

1456 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback