Average Bench: 54.1% (708th of 1459)

Based on 42,271 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00810F81 Model: AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx

Average average bench

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H averaged 45.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Single Core Speed 89Pts
Avg. Memory Latency 57.9Pts

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is 33.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Multi Core Speed 442Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 427Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 42,271 samples)
Min Avg Max
30.9 Memory 57.9 71.6
39.7 1-Core 89 114
76.1 2-Core 161 210
57.7% 103 Pts
Min Avg Max
151 4-Core 272 346
240 8-Core 427 553
43% 350 Pts
Min Avg Max
257 64-Core 442 554
27.3% 442 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 72.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 186
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 613
59% 485 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 70.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 208
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 536
52% 427 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Memory 69
1-Core 105
2-Core 183
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 450
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 62.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 185
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 42.4
26% 155 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Memory 66.8
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 144
56% 96 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 33
20% 118 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 8.35
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 56
32% 54.3 Pts
4-Core 32
8-Core 53.6
5% 42.8 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 8.31
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 152
40% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 30
8-Core 50.4
5% 40.2 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
42,271 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,257,642 CPUs tested

Typical Ryzen 7 3750H Builds (Compare 2,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 26%
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 23%

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT


Popular Ryzen 7 3750H systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added n/a ago.

Disliked (edit your comment) Add link

3 months ago.


CPU is garbage do not buy any laptop with this processor. No idea why they even made this chip in 2019 nor have a clue why laptop manufactures pair weak CPU's with GPU's they bottle neck except just to save a few dollars. CPU's from 2012 are more powerful then one that comes 7 years later. If you're looking to buy a laptop do your research first but i recommend getting a desktop and never looking back.—Jul '22


14 days ago.


Absolute garbage. Biggest regret of my life...—Jun '21


5 months ago.

It may be cheap bt the manufacturers using it make bottlenecks happen


13 months ago.

bought this like 2 months before the 4000 series released biggest regret ever


3 years ago.

Unfortunately, it does worse than 8th gen i5, but its still a worthy CPU, especially with the lower TDP (hopefully increasing battery life). May run into bottle necks for higher GPUs. Also it can't run 2666mhz RAM ;(


2 years ago.


This is not worth calling it a Ryzen 7. Worse than desktop I3, bottlenecks 1660, 2060.—Jan '21


3 years ago.

Hello guys. I do not know wether to buy amd r7 and radeon rx550m laptop or intel i7 - 8500 gtx 1050 4gb laptop. The prices are the same. Pls don't mind the rating I just made it to write this


4 years ago.

Third generation AMD Mobile processor but worse than 8550U :(


12 months ago.

Lol this is worse than i3 gen 4 processor back in 2013, why is it even made in 2019 and labelled Ryzen 7? This is scam smh


4 years ago.

It may come as a surprise to some but I use my computer for gaming AND for work. That leaves team blue the odd man out.


4 years ago.

This is a 4 core 8 thread processor, with a base speed of 3.1, and can go up to 4.1 per core. It is comparable to the i5-9300H, although slightly worse, and costs much less than the 9300H, while also having a lower TDP. It can bottleneck GPUs like the 1660-Ti or the 2060(mobile version), but by 14%, so it's not a huge bottleneck. Most games will only need 4 cores, and these four cores are more than good to run day to day tasks. It also comes with the Vega 10 iGPU, so if you're into very light gaming, without buying a dedicated GPU, this is way better than any similar specced Intel CPU.

1459 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback