TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

Xeon E3-1245 v5

▲ 501 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.50 GHz, Skylake.
Release date ≈ Q1 2016.

Average Bench: 75.8% (308th of 1459)

Based on 2,081 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000506E3 Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 v5 @ 3.50GHz
Poor: 66%Average: 75.8% Great: 84%
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Popular builds with this CPU

Good average bench

The Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 averaged 24.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 82.2Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 108Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 is just 17.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 579Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 571Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,081 samples)
Rank 30875.8%
Min Avg Max
72.6 Memory 82.2 90.6
86.6 1-Core 108 122
165 2-Core 208 239
75.5% 133 Pts
Min Avg Max
309 4-Core 376 441
450 8-Core 571 635
58.7% 473 Pts
Min Avg Max
474 64-Core 579 632
35.9% 579 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 218
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 594
65% 512 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 526
58% 459 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 222
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 598
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
79.8% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 210
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 596
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
79.4% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 219
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 591
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
78.9% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 597
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
76.4% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 207
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 583
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
72.3% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 197
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 518
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
72.1% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 201
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 594
57% 470 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
2,081 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,303,245 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Xeon E3-1245 v5 Builds (Compare 3,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

CPU
Xeon E3-1245 v5IntelBench 76%, 2,081 samples1x
GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples231x
Quadro K2200Nvidia  $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples216x
Quadro K620Nvidia  $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples182x
SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples143x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples102x
MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 77%, 2,468 samples77x
RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples163x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples107x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples107x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Xeon E3-1245 v5 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Xeon® Processor E3-1245 v5 (8M Cache, 3.50 GHz)
Code NameSkylake
Launch DateQ4'15
Processor NumberE3-1245V5
# of Cores4
# of Threads8
Cache8 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsSSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
VID Voltage Range0.55V-1.52V
Recommended Price$284.00 - $294.00
Clock Speed3.50 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency3.90 GHz
Bus Speed8 GT/s DMI3
Scalability1S Only
Max TDP80 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics P530
Graphics Base Frequency400.00 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI/DVI
Wireless DisplayYes
# of Displays Supported3
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency1.15 GHz
Quick Sync VideoYes
InTru 3D TechYes
Clear Video HD TechYes
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes
Graphics Video Max Memory1.7 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size64 GB
Memory TypesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V
Memory Channels2
Memory Bandwidth34.1 GB/s
ECC Memory SupportedYes

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision3.0
PCI Express Configurations1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes16

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost Tech2.0
Hyper-Threading TechYes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
TSX-NIYes
vPro TechYes

Package

Package Size37.5mm x 37.5mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCLGA1151

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardYes
Trusted Execution TechYes

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

1459 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback